Then as a neutral, do you support the game, in it's current form? Are you in agreeance with the six again and the captain's challenge and the bunker dissecting every play of the game and still stuffing it up?
I have some problems with the game in its current form. Quite a few.
The six again hasn't worked as intended.
And fiddling around with it this year hasn't worked either.
The biggest problem is that we hardly ever know what the six again is for and who infringed. With a penalty, the ref has time to call out what the penalty was for and who infringed and usually points to the player as well. I think we have to go back to just blowing a penalty instead of a six again. Things went ok doing that for a long time.
I like the captain's challenge, just as I like the batsman's challenge in cricket. Although it is poorly used a lot in RL and teams are exploiting it as they always do. A few changes in how it's enforced and I'd keep it.
Bunker? Where to start...
Firstly, I have no time for idiots who abuse refs. It’s not uncommon in schoolboy games for the police to have to be called to escort a 17-year-old ref from the ground because parents and supporters of the losing side have surrounded the refs change sheds. And we are talking about games that are in age groups at under 16’s level or younger. It’s a frigging disgrace.
At NRL level, there are too many idiots who bag refs and always blame them for their team’s loss. I’d love to give those idiots a whistle and sit back and watch them make fools of themselves.
These are people who are usually sitting on their fat arses in the comfort of their loungerooms. A ref covers more distance in a game than anyone, other than the touch judges sometimes, they are involved in every play. They have to make split-second decisions with sweat in their eyes, their heads moving as they run, with their view often impeded by bodies between them and the ball.
They have to watch the ruck, the 10, the markers, the dummy half. And that’s just at the play the ball. Touch judges help, but being a touch judge is even harder sometimes, with a sea of arms and legs and bodies in front of them and in high scoring games often cover more distance in a game than anyone, doing a 100m sprint after each conversion or penalty attempt and then be ready for the kick-off.
Idiot fans who abuse refs and touch judges haven’t got a clue.
Refs and touch judges have to be extremely fit just to get through a game. There are a couple of refs who have gotten to the end of a Yo-Yo test where the tape has finished and they’re still going.
Most idiot fans who abuse them would drop dead doing the warm up.
Having said all that, I don’t understand how the guys in the bunker with big Hi_Res screens, lots of angles, super slow-mo, a comfy chair and bottled water in hand can get some decisions so blatantly and obviously wrong.
And it’s used too much, slows the game down too much too often. You watch games below NRL level with no bunker and it just flows so much better, the ref makes the call and we get on with the game.
I’d probably get rid of the bunker if it was up to me, but the problem with that is the technology is there, and would be used by the media after games, refs would get crucified for any decision they got wrong by the losing team and the media. The back page of the Telegraph would have a still of the ball touching the ground in-goal when a ref had said no try, not grounded and so on, etc, etc, etc.
But I’m still leaning towards getting rid of the bunker.
Cheers,
RW.