U.S. Politics - Thread

U.S. Politics


  • Total voters
    103
Status
Not open for further replies.

CroydonDog

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
19,621
Reaction score
16,720
As it's approaching midnight on the East Coast, there probably won't be much more news tonight.
 

steeliz

Kennel Addict
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
7,193
Reaction score
8,028
But if the media were fair and accurate in their reporting, and based on BLM's agenda during 2020, you would anticipate Trumps vote with ethnic minorities should have gone backwards - by quite a significant margin.

The fact it did the opposite should leave people asking a number of questions (which I don't expect will happen), because most people have just bought the MSM narrative on Trump. Bad, racist, evil.
Pretty much this exactly.

You are finally coming around.

Proud of you mate.
 

Flanagun

Banned
In the Sin Bin
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
22,588
Reaction score
20,581
Except for the video posted by Kamala Harris the day before the election promoting equity, which is literally fundamental to socialism.
She wasn't promoting a socialit agenda....she was simply talking about eliminating systemic disadvantages which put minority groups behind the 8 ball well before the starting gun has fired. Here is what she said:

So, there’s a big difference between equality and equity. Equality suggests, “Oh, everyone should get the same amount.” The problem with that: Not everybody’s starting out from the same place. So, if we’re all getting the same amount, but you started out back there and I started out over here, we could get the same amount, but you’re still going to be that far back behind me. It’s about giving people the resources and the support they need so that everyone can be on equal footing, and then compete on equal footing. Equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place.

If you break down what she's actually saying, she's not talking about giving everyone the same thing across the board. She's talking about removing certain obstacles which prevent people from gaining the same opportunities...and I don't think she was even genuine about that much.

I think anyone who believes someone who has constantly rejected the prospect of supporting universal healthcare is going to a) support a full on socialist policy platform and b) get backing from party powerbrokers who have resisted a progressive like Bernie Sanders at every turn would have to be smoking the wacky backy. Sanders isn't even a socialist. He's a social democrat who wants the Dems to adopt socialised healthcare and education platforms. Things we have here in Australia to one degree or another. Do you think Australia is a socialist country.

Bernie isn't a socialist and the Dems =didn't want a bar of him as leader. Lol if you think they are going to shift to a radical socialist platform (either suddenly or even gradually) if and when they are elected.

kamala Harris is not a socialist. If anything, she was doing a bit of last minute vote fishing for progressives. There are no reds under the freaking bed.
 

steeliz

Kennel Addict
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
7,193
Reaction score
8,028
When you see a racial group voting so clearly along the lines of the colour of their skin, you should be very worried what someone has been telling them.
Funny how you think that racial groups are so susceptible that they can't think for themselves.

Maybe that racial group has been treated so badly that they all agree Trump is a fucktard through shared social experience.

Just because you have been brainwashed doesn't mean everybody else can be.

I am immigrant and obviously belong to a minority group. Most people from my demographic and generation have a shared experience.

To have you tell us that it is all because someone has been 'telling' us that we should feel a certain way is insulting and demeaning.

That statement alone shows what type of fuckwit you really are.
 
Last edited:

CroydonDog

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
19,621
Reaction score
16,720
The usual suspects in Australia backing Trump's completely baseless fraud accusations:


Joe Hockey and George Christensen back unfounded 'fraud' claims about Biden comeback
Australian conservatives rebuked for ‘making comments that aren’t thought through’
Paul Karp
@Paul_Karp
Thu 5 Nov 2020 13.30 AEDTLast modified on Thu 5 Nov 2020 14.12 AEDT



Joe Hockey at the ambassador’s residence in Washington DC last year
Joe Hockey at the Australian ambassador’s residence in Washington last year. The former treasurer has questioned Joe Biden’s strong comeback in the presidential election. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP

Joe Hockey has lent his voice to disputed claims of voter fraud in the US, using anecdotal evidence consistent with previous elections to raise doubt about the presidential election result.
The former treasurer and ambassador to the US told Sydney’s 2GB radio on Thursday that there were “plenty of good reason” for Donald Trump and the Republican campaign team to challenge results – which are still being counted – through litigation.
The Labor party leader, Anthony Albanese, rebuked Hockey, saying it “doesn’t help to have Australians make comments that aren’t thought through” questioning the legitimacy of results.

Hockey is one of a number of conservatives questioning Joe Biden’s strong comeback in the vote count, including the Nationals MP George Christensen, who on Facebook has been slapped with a warning for misleading claims about “dodgy votes” boosting the former vice president.
Hockey, Australia’s ambassador from 2016 to January 2020, said the US electoral system was “a complete dog’s breakfast, right across, not just Pennsylvania, but right across the country”.
“I mean there are 10,000 different organisations which are responsible for setting the rules for the US presidential election,” he told 2GB.
“In the US, you have every state, and every county and every city. And if there is a strong bias, one way or the other, they do everything they can to suppress the vote, or increase the vote. It’s a mess.”
Asked if electoral fraud were possible in the US system, Hockey replied: “Oh for sure. The question is whether it is enough to change the election outcome and I doubt it is, but absolutely.”
Sign up for the US election briefing for Australiaand get the must-reads and most important updates of the day sent to your inbox
Hockey attempted to support the unfounded claim by noting that in Washington DC “some people got two ballot papers … and of course, last night, in Washington DC, 93% of the city voted for Joe Biden”.
Advertisement

He said the margin was “hard to believe” because his best booth in the seat of North Sydney had delivered him 83% of the vote.
In fact, Biden’s win of 93% of the vote is consistent with results in the District of Columbia which strongly backed the Democratic candidate in the 2016 election by 91%, in 2012 (91%) and 2008 (92%).
Albanese told reporters in Sydney that Biden’s results were “pretty consistent” with previous outcomes, rebuking Hockey for saying there was “a question mark over the legitimacy of the Washington DC vote”.
Christensen posted on Facebook early on Thursday morning that his prediction that Trump would win “didn’t take Democrat vote fraud into account”.
Christensen posted graphs of what he termed “unnatural jumps in tallies in Wisconsin and Michigan” and falsely attributed them to “dodgy extra votes at about 4 in the morning, just like the president [Donald Trump] said”.
Nationals MP George Christensen falsely claims the change of lead in the US election is the result of ‘dodgy votes’
FacebookTwitterPinterest
Nationals MP George Christensen falsely claims the change of lead in the US election is the result of ‘dodgy votes’. Photograph: George Christensen Facebook
Advertisement

Politifact has explained the spikes were caused by counties releasing results from large batches of votes – which favoured Biden but also included votes for Trump.
Facebook warned users that Christensen’s post was “missing context”, adding a link to the Politifact fact-check concluding that the jumps in votes do not substantiate claims of fraud.


Christensen has also cast doubt on democratic election results by asking “what is going on in the US?” and linking to Trump campaign materials explaining how “they’re [Democrats are] trying to steal the election”.
The One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts also expressed scepticism by noting on Facebook that Trump had gone “from having a strong lead in the battleground states … to his lead strangely disappearing putting Biden in the lead”. “What is going on?”
Roberts and the Nationals senator Matt Canavan found a silver lining in the fact that as of 4 November the US has officially quit the Paris climate agreement.
Canavan said “the result of the US election might not be known for a while yet” but he did not cast doubt on the vote count.
In the 2020 campaign social media companies such as Twitter has been more active in labelling claims by Trump as misleading, including adding a warning to a tweet on election night falsely claiming that Democrats were trying to “steal” the election.
 

CaptainJackson

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
16,626
Reaction score
20,824
Funny how you think that racial groups are so susceptible that they can't think for themselves.

Maybe that racial group has been treated so badly that they all agree Trump is a fucktard through shared social experience.

Just because you haver been brainwashed doesn't mean everybody else can be.

I am immigrant and most people from my demographic and generation have a shared experience.

To have you tell us that it is all because someone has been 'telling' us that we should feel this way is insulting and shows what type of fuckwit you really are.
Haven't you been reading his posts? Don't you get it? Those racial groups are less than white people, those racial groups should be subservient to white people and have only themselves to blame.
 

Dawgfather

Banned
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
8,835
Reaction score
1,900
She wasn't promoting a socialit agenda....she was simply talking about eliminating systemic disadvantages which put minority groups behind the 8 ball well before the starting gun has fired. Here is what she said:

So, there’s a big difference between equality and equity. Equality suggests, “Oh, everyone should get the same amount.” The problem with that: Not everybody’s starting out from the same place. So, if we’re all getting the same amount, but you started out back there and I started out over here, we could get the same amount, but you’re still going to be that far back behind me. It’s about giving people the resources and the support they need so that everyone can be on equal footing, and then compete on equal footing. Equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place.

If you break down what she's actually saying, she's not talking about giving everyone the same thing across the board. She's talking about removing certain obstacles which prevent people from gaining the same opportunities...and I don't think she was even genuine about that much.

I think anyone who believes someone who has constantly rejected the prospect of supporting universal healthcare is going to a) support a full on socialist policy platform and b) get backing from party powerbrokers who have resisted a progressive like Bernie Sanders at every turn would have to be smoking the wacky backy. Sanders isn't even a socialist. He's a social democrat who wants the Dems to adopt socialised healthcare and education platforms. Things we have here in Australia to one degree or another. Do you think Australia is a socialist country.

Bernie isn't a socialist and the Dems =didn't want a bar of him as leader. Lol if you think they are going to shift to a radical socialist platform (either suddenly or even gradually) if and when they are elected.

kamala Harris is not a socialist. If anything, she was doing a bit of last minute vote fishing for progressives. There are no reds under the freaking bed.
How do you propose to equalise the playing field? Because that is exactly what Harris suggested should happen (via the video).

Does this mean that we should take money away from celebrities and politicians and business executives until they have exactly the same amount as other poorer people? Who decides what an equal playing field? Is it based on financial metrics? Social metrics? Education? Health? Security?

Also, the video suggests everyone needs to end up in exactly the same place. This is straight up hardcore equity doctrines that belong in socialist and marxist countries. If you want everyone to end up exactly the same and start from the same place, the only way to do that is through murder.

Guess what happened tens of millions of times through the 1900s when socialism attempted to 'equalise the playing field'? Tens of millions died attempting it.
 

Dawgfather

Banned
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
8,835
Reaction score
1,900
Haven't you been reading his posts? Don't you get it? Those racial groups are less than white people, those racial groups should be subservient to white people and have only themselves to blame.
What do you think of the fact that asian americans have a higher median income than white americans? How do you suppose this happened in such a 'racist' country?
 

steeliz

Kennel Addict
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
7,193
Reaction score
8,028
Haven't you been reading his posts? Don't you get it? Those racial groups are less than white people, those racial groups should be subservient to white people and have only themselves to blame.
Trust me I know.

I have been 'debating' with him for a while until I just gave up and just started to make fun of his ignorance and stupidity.

Unfortunately when racists like @Dawgfather rear their sad, pathetic heads it make me want to attack the utter ignorance of their sad, pathetic lives.

It has become a reflex action.
 

CrittaMagic69

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Gilded
SC H2H Champion
2 x SC Draft Champ
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
73,313
Reaction score
79,130
What do you think of the fact that asian americans have a higher median income than white americans? How do you suppose this happened in such a 'racist' country?
Asians are good at maths and shify so they're probably accountants and stealing money from their clients.
 

wendog33

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Ladder Champion
Joined
Aug 6, 2016
Messages
25,672
Reaction score
29,299
Funny how you think that racial groups are so susceptible that they can't think for themselves.

Maybe that racial group has been treated so badly that they all agree Trump is a fucktard through shared social experience.

Just because you have been brainwashed doesn't mean everybody else can be.

I am immigrant and obviously belong to a minority group. Most people from my demographic and generation have a shared experience.

To have you tell us that it is all because someone has been 'telling' us that we should feel a certain way is insulting and demeaning.

That statement alone shows what type of fuckwit you really are.
The dropkick even asserts I only have the views I have because I am a woman and what I've been told and seen.

That's how narrow minded he is.

Wasting your time conversing with him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top